Archive for September, 2009

Posted by Admin | September 30, 2009

Health risk assessments face genetic bias hurdle

The GINA modifications to the Internal Revenue Code add prohibitions against discrimination based on genetic information to Subtitle K, which covers group health plan requirements originally regulated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

The interim final rules, which are slated to take effect in 60 days, will affect group health plans for plan years beginning on or after Dec. 7.

This could be especially problematic for employers that have started or are about to begin open enrollment for 2010, according to Andy Anderson, a partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius L.L.P. in Chicago.

“With 2010 designs already in place, these rules are going to make it difficult for employers to scramble to change plan designs (that incorporate financial incentives for completing HRAs) in the next month or two,” he said.

“Family medical history plays an important role in health risk assessments,” he noted. “To get people to fill out HRAs, many employers had to provide financial incentives. As feared, these regulations say the type of HRA that includes family medical history cannot have financial incentives associated with it.”

The regulations “also prohibit even the collection of genetic information prior to enrollment, so even employers that don’t have incentives could be impacted,” observed Richard Stover, a principal at Buck Consultants L.L.C. based in Secaucus, N.J.

Although the rules are slated to take effect 60 days after their Oct. 1 publication d

Read more…

Posted by Admin | September 26, 2009

Hartford names ex-Bank of America exec McGee as CEO

“Liam’s strong track record of success in leading large, complex financial services organizations makes him the ideal person to build on The Hartford’s strong foundation,” Michael G. Morris, Hartford’s presiding director, said in the statement.

Posted by Admin | September 22, 2009

GAO suggests change to 401(k) hardship withdrawal rule

The GAO also recommends that the Labor Department encourage employers to post on participant Web sites information on the long-term impact preretirement withdrawals of funds can have on their 401(k) plan account balances.

For example, employers could provide participants with modeling tools to help them calculate the impact of a preretirement withdrawal of funds, the GAO said.

In addition, the Labor Department could encourage employers to provide employees who terminate employment with projections showing how their account balances would compare at retirement if left in the plan or taken as a lump-sum distribution, the GAO said.

Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., who chairs the Senate Special Committee on Aging and who requested the GAO report, said in a statement that he intends to introduce legislation to reduce preretirement “leakage” from 401(k) plans.

“Despite the financial hardships many are facing, people need to resist raiding their 401(k), because it can be a really bad deal for them over the long run,” Sen. Kohl said.

Posted by Admin | September 18, 2009

W.R. Berkley forms U.S. energy unit

Berkley Oil & Gas will provide various coverages—including general liability, auto liability, workers compensation, umbrella coverage, inland marine and property—as well as risk control services, Berkley said in a statement.

Heading Berkley Oil & Gas is President Carol Randall, who previously served as chief underwriting officer for an oil and gas unit at Travelers Cos. Inc.

Greenwich, Conn.-based Berkley also has an offshore energy underwriting unit.

Posted by Admin | September 17, 2009

Business Owners Insurance Policy

Business Owners Insurance Policy also known as BOP is a packaged policy that combines Property Insurance and General Liability.  It can also come with other add on coverages for small and medium size businesses that are in a low risk class.  Some of the factors that go into determining eligibility include annual sales and number of employees.  A Business Owners Policy includes property insurance to cover physical assets and general liability for your commercial liability. 

Find quotes for Business Owners Insurance by going to the home page of Commercial Insurance .NET

Posted by Admin | September 14, 2009

Measure to repeal health insurers’ antitrust exemption unveiled

The Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2009, which also would apply to medical malpractice insurers, would remove the exemption for the most egregious forms of antitrust violations—including price fixing, bid rigging and market allocations—and subject insurers “to the same fair competition laws that apply to nearly every other company doing business in the United States,” according to a statement released by the senator’s office.

“A few industries have used their influence to obtain a special statutory exemption from antitrust laws, and the insurance industry is one of them,” Sen. Leahy said in the statement. “In the markets for health insurance and medical malpractice insurance, patients and doctors are paying the price, as costs continue to increase at an alarming rate. Insurers should not object to being subject to the same antitrust laws as everyone else.”

Sen. Leahy’s bill, which was introduced in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday, is a narrower version of a bill Reps. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., and Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., unveiled earlier this year that would give the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission the authority to apply antitrust laws to anticompetitive behavior by all insurers.

The insurance industry has traditionally opposed legislation repealing the exemption, which allows insurers to pool historic loss information so that they are better able to project future losses and charge an actuarially based price for their products. It also allows for

Read more…

Posted by Admin | September 14, 2009

Global investors call for binding climate policy

“Without the policies to encourage clean energy, investors are stuck at the starting gates,” Mindy Lubber, the president of Ceres, a Boston-based coalition of investors and environmentalists, and the director of the Investor Network on Climate Risk.

More than 180 investor groups called for a global target of emissions reductions of 50% to 85% by 2050, including higher cuts by wealthy countries, and plans in developing countries to make measurable emissions reductions.

Many investors have complained that until climate policies are agreed upon it will be hard to finance and invest in billion dollar projects such as nuclear or natural gas-fired power plants.

The investors also called for revisions to the United Nation’s Clean Development Mechanism, a Kyoto protocol program, that allows polluters in rich countries to claim emission cuts by investing in clean projects such as small hydropower and alternative energy in developing countries.

The call for action comes ahead of a climate conference at the United Nations next week in which global leaders, including President Barack Obama and China’s President Hu Jintao, are slated to talk about tackling climate change. The meeting is seen as a chance for leaders to break a deadlock between rich and poor countries on how to share the burden of cutting emissions blamed for global warming.

The gathering will come ahead of a U.N.

Read more…

Posted by Admin | September 09, 2009

Allstate settles age bias class action for $4.5 million

The litigation with the EEOC, which was filed in 2004, stems from the Northbrook, Ill.-based insurer’s efforts in 2000 to convert its 15,000-member agent workforce to independent contractors from regular employees.

The EEOC said Allstate had adopted a hiring moratorium for a period of one year, or while severance benefits were being received, that had a disproportionate impact on workers over age 40 because more than 90% of the agents subjected to it were in that age group. Allstate has denied that its hiring moratorium violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.

An Allstate spokesman said in a statement that “while confident that we acted appropriately,” the insurer decided to settle the dispute “to avoid the burden and considerable expense of continued litigation for everyone involved.”

The spokesman said Allstate believes “its position is correct and that it would have ultimately prevailed in this case. The court has indicated, and the EEOC acknowledges, that the dispute is centered on a point of law over which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion.”

Page 1 of 212»